v1.0
Home Flight Operations ⭐ GitHub
📊

Process Flow Diagram (BPMN)

FO-04 BPMN diagram
📋

L4 Process Steps

StepStep NameRole / Swim LaneSystem InputOutputKPIDec?Exc?
Phase 1
1.1
Pull aircraft DOW/DOI from maintenance system Load Controller AMOS by Swiss AviationSoftware Tail number assignment from OCC Dry Operating Weight, Dry Operating Index, seating config, hold bay limits Configuration accuracy 100%; zero dispatches with incorrect DOW N Y
1.2 Retrieve fuel uplift from flight planning system Load Controller Lido/Flight by Lufthansa Systems Signed flight plan released by dispatcher Fuel figure (trip, contingency, alternate, final reserve) in kg for load calculation Fuel data transfer latency < 5 min from dispatch plan release N N
1.3 Calculate structural limits and underload allowance Load Controller SITA LoadManager DOW, fuel load, aircraft type structural limits (MTOW, MZFW, MLW, MAC envelope) Maximum payload, underload figure, allowed traffic load by cabin and hold Underload figure accuracy ±50 kg versus final actuals Y N
Phase 2
2.1
Extract PAX counts from check-in at cutoff Load Controller Amadeus Altéa PSS Departure control check-in data at standard cutoff (T-35 min) Final passenger counts by cabin class; PAX weight totals using standard weights Cutoff-to-load-sheet cycle time < 15 min N Y
2.2 Apply IATA standard or actual PAX weights Load Controller SITA LoadManager PAX count, season flag, route type (domestic/international), cabin class mix Total PAX weight per IATA Resolution 788 (84 kg male / 76 kg female with carry-on) Weight deviation vs actuals < 2% for domestic routes Y N
2.3 Capture checked baggage weights at bag room Baggage Handler / Load Controller SITA BagManager Baggage tag scans at make-up area belt Per-flight total hold baggage weight by zone and ULD Baggage weight reconciliation ≥ 99% of tagged bags per flight N Y
2.4 Process special PAX categories from SSR codes Load Controller / Ground Service Agent Amadeus Altéa PSS SSR codes (UMNR, WCHC, EXST, BSCT, MEDA) from reservation record Special category weights and seating constraints applied to load plan SSR compliance rate 100%; zero unmanaged special PAX categories at load sheet issue N Y
Phase 3
3.1
Receive cargo manifest and ULD build data Load Controller CargoWise / SITA AMS Air waybill manifest, ULD build sheets from cargo acceptance Cargo weight, volume, and loading sequence by hold bay Cargo manifest received ≥ T-60 min before departure; late manifest rate < 5% Y Y
3.2 Validate and approve DG load — issue NOTOC Load Controller / DG Acceptance Agent Cargospot by SITA DG declaration, ICAO packing group, quantity and UN number Approved DG stowage position; NOTOC transmitted to captain via ACARS DG NOTOC issued to captain ≥ T-30 min before departure; 100% ICAO Annex 18 compliance Y Y
3.3 Allocate hold bay loading positions for CG target Load Controller SITA LoadManager Cargo weight and volume by ULD, DG stowage rules, ZFW CG target Bay loading plan (fwd/aft hold, bulk), tie-down instructions for ramp crew CG within ±1% MAC of target after initial bay allocation N N
Phase 4
4.1
Generate preliminary e-LoadSheet with ZFW/TOW/LDW Load Controller SITA LoadManager PAX weights, baggage weights, cargo bay plan, fuel load, DOW Preliminary ZFW, TOW, LDW, CG %MAC on electronic Load Sheet Preliminary load sheet ready ≥ T-30 min before scheduled departure N Y
4.2 Validate CG within certified flight envelope Load Controller SITA LoadManager TOW and CG %MAC from preliminary load sheet CG validation result — pass or fail against fwd and aft certified limits CG out-of-envelope rate < 0.01% of departures (IATA industry benchmark) Y Y
4.3 Calculate stabiliser trim setting and confirm CG index Load Controller / Captain SITA LoadManager / Jeppesen FliteDeck (EFB) Final TOW, CG %MAC, selected flap setting Stab trim setting transmitted to captain; load sheet CG index confirmed Stab trim setting issued to flight deck ≥ T-20 min before departure N Y
4.4 Transmit final load sheet to flight deck via ACARS Load Controller SITA ACARS / Jeppesen FliteDeck (EFB) Finalised and signed e-LoadSheet Load sheet delivered to flight deck; ACARS receipt confirmation captured Load sheet delivery ≥ T-20 min before departure; ACARS receipt confirmation within 2 min N Y
Phase 5
5.1
Captain reviews and signs load sheet on EFB Captain / First Officer Jeppesen FliteDeck (EFB) e-LoadSheet, stab trim, NOTOC, and fuel plan Captain's electronic signature on load sheet; acceptance transmitted to load control Captain acceptance cycle time < 5 min; load sheet rejection rate < 0.5% Y Y
5.2 Issue final loading instruction and close holds Load Controller / Ramp Supervisor SITA AMS (Airport Management System) Accepted load sheet, finalised bay loading plan Final loading instruction transmitted to ramp; hold door closure authorised Hold closure notification ≥ T-10 min before departure; D0 on-time departure impact attributable to W&B < 0.3% Y Y
5.3 Archive load sheet and transmit LDM to destination Load Controller SITA LoadManager / Telex ACARS Signed load sheet; final PAX, cargo, and fuel actuals Load Distribution Message (LDM) transmitted to destination station and OCC; load sheet archived per ICAO Annex 6 (24-month retention) LDM transmitted within 5 min of actual departure; 100% archival compliance rate N Y
📋

Process Attributes

Identification

Process IDFO-04
L1 DomainFlight Operations
L2 ProcessFlight Dispatch & Control
L3 NameWeight & Balance Management
L4 Steps17 across 5 phases
Decision Gates7 (all with iteration loops)
Exceptions13 documented

Swim Lanes (Roles)

Load Controller
Baggage Handler / Load Controller
Load Controller / Ground Service Agent
Load Controller / DG Acceptance Agent
Load Controller / Captain
Captain / First Officer
Load Controller / Ramp Supervisor

Systems & Tools

AMOS by Swiss AviationSoftwareLido/Flight by Lufthansa SystemsSITA LoadManagerAmadeus Altéa PSSSITA BagManagerCargoWise / SITA AMSCargospot by SITASITA LoadManager / Jeppesen FliteDeck (EFB)SITA ACARS / Jeppesen FliteDeck (EFB)Jeppesen FliteDeck (EFB)SITA AMS (Airport Management System)SITA LoadManager / Telex ACARS

Key Performance Indicators

Pull aircraft DOW/DOI from maintenance systemConfiguration accuracy 100%; zero dispatches with incorrect DOW
Retrieve fuel uplift from flight planning systemFuel data transfer latency < 5 min from dispatch plan release
Calculate structural limits and underload allowanceUnderload figure accuracy ±50 kg versus final actuals
Extract PAX counts from check-in at cutoffCutoff-to-load-sheet cycle time < 15 min
Apply IATA standard or actual PAX weightsWeight deviation vs actuals < 2% for domestic routes
Capture checked baggage weights at bag roomBaggage weight reconciliation ≥ 99% of tagged bags per flight
Process special PAX categories from SSR codesSSR compliance rate 100%; zero unmanaged special PAX categories at load sheet issue
Receive cargo manifest and ULD build dataCargo manifest received ≥ T-60 min before departure; late manifest rate < 5%

Airline-Specific Risks & Pain Points

Last-minute aircraft swaps (e.g., 737-800 replaced by 737-700) cause DOW discrepancy if AMOS weight record not updated within 30 min of tail reassignment
Manual re-entry required when API link between Lido/Flight and SITA LoadManager is unavailable; transcription errors produce erroneous TOW calculations
MZFW and MTOW vary by 737 sub-variant (e.g., 737-800 vs 737-8 MAX); incorrect variant code in LoadManager causes structural limit overrun risk without automated alert
Late check-in waivers granted after cutoff add PAX to Altéa without auto-alerting load controller; controller may issue load sheet based on stale PAX count
Incorrect season flag (summer/winter) in SITA LoadManager causes systematic 4 kg/PAX under-estimate on narrow-body routes with no automated audit trail for season changes
Individual baggage weighting not performed on narrow-body short-haul; weight estimated from PAX count × standard bag weight, resulting in actual vs plan variance exceeding 200 kg on full flights

Inputs / Outputs

Primary InputTail number assignment from OCC
Primary OutputLoad Distribution Message (LDM) transmitted to destination station and OCC; load sheet archived per ICAO Annex 6 (24-month retention)
PreviousFO-03 · Fuel Planning & TankeringNextFO-05 · NOTAMs & AIP Information Management