Interline & Codeshare Fare Proration
Network Planning & Scheduling › Pricing & Fare Management · 14 L4 steps · 4 phases · 8 decision gates · Updated 2026-03-18 19:38
📊
Process Flow Diagram (BPMN)
📋
L4 Process Steps
| Step | Step Name | Role / Swim Lane | System | Input | Output | KPI | Dec? | Exc? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 1.1 |
Load interline & SPA agreement terms into RA system | Revenue Accounting Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) | Signed interline agreement or Special Prorate Agreement (SPA) from commercial team | Active prorate factor set and SPA parameters loaded in ARA | Agreement setup lead time ≤5 business days from signature | Y | N |
| 1.2 | Ingest ATPCO prorate factor tables (PF Tables) | Revenue Accounting Analyst | ATPCO Prorate Data | IATA Resolution 850 prorate tables published via ATPCO filing cycle | Validated prorate factor file loaded into ARA for IATA-standard interline tickets | Prorate table update cycle ≤24 hours after ATPCO publication date | N | Y |
| 1.3 | Classify ticket as interline, codeshare, or hybrid | Revenue Accounting Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) | Issued electronic ticket (ET) with multi-carrier coupon segments and validating carrier code | Ticket classified with proration method assigned: IATA standard, SPA override, or codeshare split | Auto-classification rate ≥95% of interline tickets without manual intervention | Y | Y |
Phase 2 2.1 |
Extract OD fare components and fare basis codes | Revenue Accounting Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) | ET record with fare breakdown, applicable fare basis codes, and coupon sequence | Per-segment fare basis code, ticketed point mileage (TPM), and applicable fare component isolated per coupon | Fare extraction error rate <0.5% of processed interline tickets | N | Y |
| 2.2 | Apply IATA mileage proration to derive carrier percentages | Revenue Accounting Analyst | ATPCO Prorate Data + Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) | Per-segment ticketed point mileage (TPM), total OD fare amount, ATPCO PF tables | Carrier-specific proration percentage and prorated revenue amount per segment | Mileage calculation accuracy ≥99.5% against IATA TACT reference data | Y | N |
| 2.3 | Apply Special Prorate Agreement overrides where eligible | Pricing Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) — SPA Module | SPA terms: flat-rate splits, percentage overrides, minimum/maximum guarantees per route and cabin | SPA-adjusted revenue allocation per carrier segment, superseding IATA mileage proration where SPA applies | SPA override application rate = 100% for all tickets on SPA-covered routes during SPA validity period | N | Y |
| 2.4 | Allocate taxes and YQ/YR surcharges per carrier rules | Revenue Accounting Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) | Tax and surcharge breakdown from ET record: government taxes, YQ fuel surcharge, YR carrier-imposed surcharge | Tax allocation per carrier — carrier-specific government taxes retained by respective carrier; YQ/YR allocated per agreement or IATA Resolution 728 | Tax allocation error rate <0.1% of total ticket value across processed interline tickets | Y | Y |
Phase 3 3.1 |
Generate interline billing memo for ICH submission | Revenue Accounting Analyst | IATA Clearing House (ICH) | Prorated revenue amounts per carrier, tax allocations, coupon status from GDS | Billing memo submitted to ICH for each partner carrier within IATA Resolution 743 deadline | Billing memo submission within T+30 days of travel date per IATA Resolution 743; late filing penalty avoidance rate ≥98% | N | Y |
| 3.2 | Validate billing memo against ET coupon at ICH | Revenue Accounting Supervisor | IATA Clearing House (ICH) | Submitted billing memo, original ET coupon data from issuing carrier, IATA prorate factor tables | ICH validation result: accepted billing memo or rejection with error code | First-pass ICH billing acceptance rate ≥92% of submitted memos | Y | Y |
| 3.3 | Issue ADM or ACM to resolve billing discrepancy | Revenue Accounting Analyst | IATA BSP Link / Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) | ICH rejection reason code, original ET data, partner airline's counter-claim if applicable | Agent Debit Memo (ADM) or Agent Credit Memo (ACM) issued to partner; revenue amount moved to suspense account pending resolution | ADM/ACM resolution within 45 days per IATA Resolution 850m; suspense account balance <0.5% of monthly interline revenue | Y | Y |
Phase 4 4.1 |
Submit net interline settlement to IATA Clearing House | Revenue Accounting Manager | IATA Clearing House (ICH) | Validated billing memos net of ADM/ACM, ICH monthly settlement calendar, partner net positions | Net settlement amount per partner airline forwarded to ICH for multilateral netting and disbursement | ICH settlement submission on-time rate = 100% (ICH settlement runs on fixed monthly calendar with no grace period) | N | Y |
| 4.2 | Post interline settlement to SAP General Ledger | Finance Analyst | SAP S/4HANA Finance (FI/CO) | ICH settlement confirmation file with net amounts per partner, tax allocation breakdown | Journal entries posted to GL — interline revenue recognition per IFRS 15, accounts receivable/payable updated per partner | GL posting within T+5 business days of ICH settlement confirmation; period-close accuracy = 100% | N | Y |
| 4.3 | Reconcile prorated actuals against RM interline forecast | Revenue Management Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Management (NRM) + SAP S/4HANA Finance (FI/CO) | ICH settlement actuals by partner and route, RM system interline revenue forecast by O&D pair | Variance report: actual vs forecast interline yield per route and partner, flagging routes with structural mis-valuation | Interline yield variance ≤±3% of RM forecast; routes exceeding threshold reviewed within 10 business days | Y | N |
| 4.4 | Audit SPA performance and flag renegotiation triggers | Pricing Manager | Amadeus Revenue Accounting (ARA) + Tableau | 12-month rolling SPA settlement actuals, guaranteed minimum revenue thresholds per SPA, partner traffic volumes | SPA performance scorecard per partner; renegotiation recommendation package for routes where guarantees are at risk or partner volumes have shifted >15% | SPA guarantee achievement rate ≥90% of active agreements; annual SPA review completion by Q1 for all agreements expiring in the calendar year | Y | N |
📋