ATPCO Filing & Maintenance
Network Planning & Scheduling › Pricing & Fare Management · 16 L4 steps · 5 phases · 6 decision gates · Updated 2026-03-18 19:41
📊
Process Flow Diagram (BPMN)
📋
L4 Process Steps
| Step | Step Name | Role / Swim Lane | System | Input | Output | KPI | Dec? | Exc? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1 1.1 |
Monitor competitive fare environment | Pricing Analyst | ATPCO Insights | Competitor fare publications, market intelligence alerts | Competitive fare landscape report by market and direction | Monitoring cycle ≤24 hrs for all revenue-managed markets | N | N |
| 1.2 | Identify and classify fare change trigger | Pricing Analyst | ATPCO Insights | Competitive fare report, revenue performance dashboard | Fare change brief (market, direction, trigger type: reactive vs strategic) | Trigger-to-brief turnaround ≤4 hrs for urgent competitive matches | Y | N |
| 1.3 | Align fare strategy with revenue management | Senior Pricing Analyst | Amadeus Revenue Management (NRM) | Fare change brief, NRM O&D inventory availability data | Approved fare strategy memo with booking class allocations and effective date window | RM alignment sign-off within 2 business hours of trigger brief submission | Y | N |
Phase 2 2.1 |
Define fare amounts, OD pairs, and basis codes | Tariff Specialist | ATPCO Fares Portal | Approved fare strategy memo, existing tariff record extract | Fare amount table with FARE BASIS CODE, OD routing, currency, and cabin applicability | Fare basis code uniqueness validation pass rate 100% prior to rule coding | N | N |
| 2.2 | Code ATPCO rule categories (Cat 3/5/6/7/14/15/25) | Tariff Specialist | ATPCO Fares Portal | Fare amount table, booking conditions brief from commercial team | Coded ATPCO rule records for Categories 3 (Seasonality), 5 (Advance Purchase), 6 (Min Stay), 7 (Max Stay), 14 (Travel Restrictions), 15 (Sales Restrictions), 25 (Fare by Rule) | Rule coding accuracy ≥99.5% (errors per 1,000 rule records filed) | N | Y |
| 2.3 | Build routing data and footnote records | Tariff Specialist | ATPCO Fares Portal | Routing validation dataset, geographic applicability requirements, blackout date schedule | Filed routing record, footnote record with blackout dates and geographic exclusions | Routing validation pass rate ≥99% on first submission to ATPCO | N | Y |
| 2.4 | Validate rule completeness and conflict check | Senior Pricing Analyst | ATPCO Fares Portal | Complete fare record set (amounts, rules, routing, footnotes) | Pre-submission validation report — pass/fail with conflict flags and resolution notes | Pre-submission conflict rate ≤2%; zero records submitted with open blocking flags | Y | N |
Phase 3 3.1 |
Submit fare transactions via ATPCO Fares Portal | Tariff Specialist | ATPCO Fares Portal | Validated fare record package, effective date window, filing priority (standard T+2 or urgent T+0) | ATPCO submission receipt with transaction batch ID and filing timestamp | Same-day filing completion for urgent competitive matches ≥95% | N | Y |
| 3.2 | Process ATPCO validation error report | Tariff Specialist | ATPCO Fares Portal | ATPCO post-submission error and warning report | Corrected record set or documented error resolution log | Blocking error resolution turnaround ≤1 business hour; warning resolution ≤4 hrs | Y | Y |
| 3.3 | Confirm effective date sequencing and filing receipt | Pricing Analyst | ATPCO Fares Portal | ATPCO submission receipt, intended sale open and travel date window | Confirmed effective date log; filing receipt stored in pricing operations tracker | Effective date accuracy 100% — zero same-day date conflicts or timezone mismatches | N | Y |
Phase 4 4.1 |
Verify fare distribution across GDS channels | GDS Distribution Analyst | Sabre GDS | ATPCO filing receipt, expected distribution timeline per GDS SLA | GDS distribution verification report across Sabre, Amadeus, and Travelport channels | GDS distribution lag ≤2 hrs post-ATPCO effective time; 100% coverage across all three major GDS channels | N | Y |
| 4.2 | Perform live GDS pricing audit | GDS Distribution Analyst | Amadeus GDS | Filed fare parameters, expected pricing rules, sample itinerary set | Pricing audit pass/fail report with 20+ sample itineraries per market and half-RT combinations | Pricing accuracy ≥99.8% across audit sample of ≥20 itineraries per market | Y | Y |
| 4.3 | Activate NDC and direct channel fare distribution | Pricing Manager | NDC API Gateway | GDS audit pass confirmation, NDC channel routing configuration | Activated fare set across all distribution channels including NDC and direct web | NDC channel parity with GDS fares ≤15 min lag; NDC fare availability ≥98% of filed itineraries | N | Y |
Phase 5 5.1 |
Monitor competitive matching and over-filing activity | Pricing Analyst | ATPCO Insights | Post-filing competitive feed, alert thresholds configured by market | Competitive response report with escalation flags for over-filed or under-cut markets | Competitor over-filing detection within 4 hrs; monitoring coverage ≥95% of revenue-significant markets | N | N |
| 5.2 | Execute periodic ATPCO tariff rule audit | Senior Pricing Analyst | ATPCO Fares Portal | Full tariff record export, quarterly audit schedule | Audit findings report with stale, expired, or conflicting rule flags and remediation plan | Stale rule ratio (>180 days since last review) ≤5% of active tariff records | N | Y |
| 5.3 | File fare retraction or amendment as required | Tariff Specialist | ATPCO Fares Portal | Audit findings report or RM/commercial retraction request | Filed retraction notice or amended tariff record; GDS depublication confirmation across all channels | Retraction-to-GDS-depublication lag ≤2 hrs via urgent ATPCO channel; zero open retraction requests >4 hrs | Y | Y |
📋