RR-04 RR-04-07-02 — Territory Qualification & Familiarization
This process outlines the qualification and familiarization of new crew members for specific territories within a US Class I freight railroad. It ensures that crews are adequately trained and prepared to operate trains safely and efficiently in their designated areas.
🗺 BPMN Process Flow
Click diagram to zoom & pan • Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Download SVG
📋 Process Attributes
| Process ID | RR-04-07-02 |
|---|---|
| Domain Family | OPERATIONS |
| L1 Domain | Crew Management |
| L2 Process Group | Territory Qualification & Familiarization |
| Trigger | The initiation of this process is triggered by the assignment of a new crew member to a territory or the need to reassign an existing crew member to a different territory due to changes in operational requirements. |
| Outcome | Successful completion of this process results in a fully qualified and familiarized crew member who is ready to operate trains safely and efficiently within their assigned territory, adhering to all relevant regulations and standards. |
| Systems | PS Technology (PST) HASTUS CloudMoyo Crew Management (CCM) trackHOS-class HOS monitoring tools NetControl (service design use) I-ETMS (Interoperable Electronic Train Management System) GCOR (General Code of Operating Rules) |
| Regulatory Hooks | 49 CFR Part 232 GCOR (General Code of Operating Rules) |
📋 L4 Process Steps
| Step | Name | Role | System | Input | Output | KPI | Pain Point / Risk | Decision? | Exception? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Initial Assessment | Trainmaster | PS Technology (PST) | New crew member's resume and background check results | Assessment report | Crew assessment completed within 3 days | Inconsistent assessment criteria across different trainmasters | N | N |
| 1.2 | Training Plan Development | Superintendent (Division) | HASTUS | Assessment report | Customized training plan | Training plan developed within 5 days | Limited availability of specialized trainers | Y | N |
| 1.3 | Technical Training | Locomotive Engineer | EHMS (Equipment Health Management System) | Customized training plan | Training completion certificate | 80% of technical training modules completed within 2 weeks | Technical equipment failures during training | N | Y |
| 1.4 | Operational Familiarization | Conductor | NetControl (service design use) | Training completion certificate | Familiarization log | 100% of familiarization routes covered within 4 weeks | Inadequate route documentation | Y | N |
| 1.5 | Safety Briefing | Train Dispatcher | I-ETMS (Interoperable Electronic Train Management System) | Familiarization log | Safety briefing record | 90% of safety briefings completed within 1 week | High turnover rate among dispatchers | N | Y |
| 1.6 | Regulatory Compliance Review | Local Chairman / General Chairman (union) | GCOR (General Code of Operating Rules) | Safety briefing record | Compliance report | 100% compliance with regulatory requirements | Complexity of regulatory requirements | Y | N |
| 1.7 | Final Evaluation | Superintendent (Division) | CloudMoyo Crew Management (CCM) | Compliance report | Qualification certificate | 95% of crew members qualified within 6 months | Lack of standardized evaluation criteria | N | Y |
| 1.8 | Documentation Update | Train Dispatcher | TRAIN II (Tele Rail Automated Information Network Phase 2) | Qualification certificate | Updated crew roster | 90% of updated rosters distributed within 1 day | Inefficient communication channels | N | N |
| 1.9 | Feedback Collection | Locomotive Engineer | HASTUS | Updated crew roster | Feedback report | 85% of feedback collected within 2 weeks | Low response rates from crew members | Y | N |
| 1.10 | Continuous Improvement Plan | VP Network Planning & Operations | PS Technology (PST) | Feedback report | Improvement plan | 95% of improvement plans implemented within 3 months | Resource allocation for improvements | N | Y |
| 1.11 | Performance Monitoring | Crew Caller / Crew Dispatcher | trackHOS-class HOS monitoring tools | Improvement plan | Performance metrics | 90% of performance targets met within 6 months | Inconsistent data collection methods | Y | N |
| 1.12 | Review and Adjustments | Chairman, President and CEO (plan sponsor level) | NetControl (service design use) | Performance metrics | Adjusted training plan | 95% of adjustments made within 1 month | Slow decision-making processes | N | Y |
📊 KPIs & Risk Register
KPIs
Crew assessment completed within 3 days Training plan developed within 5 days 80% of technical training modules completed within 2 weeks 100% of familiarization routes covered within 4 weeks 90% of safety briefings completed within 1 week 100% compliance with regulatory requirements 95% of crew members qualified within 6 months 90% of updated rosters distributed within 1 day 85% of feedback collected within 2 weeks 95% of improvement plans implemented within 3 months
Key Risks
Inconsistent assessment criteria across different trainmasters Limited availability of specialized trainers Technical equipment failures during training Inadequate route documentation High turnover rate among dispatchers Complexity of regulatory requirements Lack of standardized evaluation criteria Inefficient communication channels Low response rates from crew members Resource allocation for improvements Inconsistent data collection methods Slow decision-making processes
Swim Lanes
Trainmaster · 1.1, 1.2 Locomotive Engineer · 1.3, 1.4 Conductor · 1.5, 1.6 Train Dispatcher · 1.7, 1.8 Superintendent (Division) · 1.9, 1.10 VP Network Planning & Operations · 1.11, 1.12