US Class I Rail Process Wiki Crew Management › Territory Qualification & Familiarization
🗺 BPMN Process Flow
RR-04-07-02 BPMN Diagram

Click diagram to zoom & pan • Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Download SVG

📋 Process Attributes
Process IDRR-04-07-02
Domain FamilyOPERATIONS
L1 DomainCrew Management
L2 Process GroupTerritory Qualification & Familiarization
TriggerThe initiation of this process is triggered by the assignment of a new crew member to a territory or the need to reassign an existing crew member to a different territory due to changes in operational requirements.
OutcomeSuccessful completion of this process results in a fully qualified and familiarized crew member who is ready to operate trains safely and efficiently within their assigned territory, adhering to all relevant regulations and standards.
SystemsPS Technology (PST) HASTUS CloudMoyo Crew Management (CCM) trackHOS-class HOS monitoring tools NetControl (service design use) I-ETMS (Interoperable Electronic Train Management System) GCOR (General Code of Operating Rules)
Regulatory Hooks49 CFR Part 232 GCOR (General Code of Operating Rules)
📋 L4 Process Steps
StepNameRoleSystem InputOutputKPIPain Point / Risk Decision?Exception?
1.1 Initial Assessment Trainmaster PS Technology (PST) New crew member's resume and background check results Assessment report Crew assessment completed within 3 days Inconsistent assessment criteria across different trainmasters N N
1.2 Training Plan Development Superintendent (Division) HASTUS Assessment report Customized training plan Training plan developed within 5 days Limited availability of specialized trainers Y N
1.3 Technical Training Locomotive Engineer EHMS (Equipment Health Management System) Customized training plan Training completion certificate 80% of technical training modules completed within 2 weeks Technical equipment failures during training N Y
1.4 Operational Familiarization Conductor NetControl (service design use) Training completion certificate Familiarization log 100% of familiarization routes covered within 4 weeks Inadequate route documentation Y N
1.5 Safety Briefing Train Dispatcher I-ETMS (Interoperable Electronic Train Management System) Familiarization log Safety briefing record 90% of safety briefings completed within 1 week High turnover rate among dispatchers N Y
1.6 Regulatory Compliance Review Local Chairman / General Chairman (union) GCOR (General Code of Operating Rules) Safety briefing record Compliance report 100% compliance with regulatory requirements Complexity of regulatory requirements Y N
1.7 Final Evaluation Superintendent (Division) CloudMoyo Crew Management (CCM) Compliance report Qualification certificate 95% of crew members qualified within 6 months Lack of standardized evaluation criteria N Y
1.8 Documentation Update Train Dispatcher TRAIN II (Tele Rail Automated Information Network Phase 2) Qualification certificate Updated crew roster 90% of updated rosters distributed within 1 day Inefficient communication channels N N
1.9 Feedback Collection Locomotive Engineer HASTUS Updated crew roster Feedback report 85% of feedback collected within 2 weeks Low response rates from crew members Y N
1.10 Continuous Improvement Plan VP Network Planning & Operations PS Technology (PST) Feedback report Improvement plan 95% of improvement plans implemented within 3 months Resource allocation for improvements N Y
1.11 Performance Monitoring Crew Caller / Crew Dispatcher trackHOS-class HOS monitoring tools Improvement plan Performance metrics 90% of performance targets met within 6 months Inconsistent data collection methods Y N
1.12 Review and Adjustments Chairman, President and CEO (plan sponsor level) NetControl (service design use) Performance metrics Adjusted training plan 95% of adjustments made within 1 month Slow decision-making processes N Y
📊 KPIs & Risk Register

KPIs

Crew assessment completed within 3 days Training plan developed within 5 days 80% of technical training modules completed within 2 weeks 100% of familiarization routes covered within 4 weeks 90% of safety briefings completed within 1 week 100% compliance with regulatory requirements 95% of crew members qualified within 6 months 90% of updated rosters distributed within 1 day 85% of feedback collected within 2 weeks 95% of improvement plans implemented within 3 months

Key Risks

Inconsistent assessment criteria across different trainmasters Limited availability of specialized trainers Technical equipment failures during training Inadequate route documentation High turnover rate among dispatchers Complexity of regulatory requirements Lack of standardized evaluation criteria Inefficient communication channels Low response rates from crew members Resource allocation for improvements Inconsistent data collection methods Slow decision-making processes

Swim Lanes

Trainmaster · 1.1, 1.2 Locomotive Engineer · 1.3, 1.4 Conductor · 1.5, 1.6 Train Dispatcher · 1.7, 1.8 Superintendent (Division) · 1.9, 1.10 VP Network Planning & Operations · 1.11, 1.12