RR-06 RR-06-04-01 — Track Authority and Roadway Worker Protection
This process ensures track authority and roadway worker protection by managing track inspections, maintenance, and safety protocols.
🗺 BPMN Process Flow
Click diagram to zoom & pan • Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Download SVG
📋 Process Attributes
| Process ID | RR-06-04-01 |
|---|---|
| Domain Family | OPERATIONS |
| L1 Domain | Engineering: Track, Structures & Signals |
| L2 Process Group | Track Authority and Roadway Worker Protection |
| Trigger | Scheduled track inspection cycle or detection of a critical defect |
| Outcome | Ensured safe operation of the railroad with compliant track conditions and protected roadway workers. |
| Systems | NetControl I-ETMS Wabtrax Umler PS Technology |
| Regulatory Hooks | 49 CFR Part 236, Subpart I 49 CFR Part 1180 GCOR 6.28 |
📋 L4 Process Steps
| Step | Name | Role | System | Input | Output | KPI | Pain Point / Risk | Decision? | Exception? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Initiate Track Inspection Schedule | Track Supervisor | NetControl | Scheduled inspection plan | Inspection schedule notification | Track inspection coverage rate above 95% | Inaccurate scheduling leading to missed inspections | N | N |
| 1.2 | Assign Track Inspection Crew | Track Supervisor | PS Technology | Inspection schedule notification | Crew assignment and task list | Crew availability rate above 90% | Crew unavailability due to unforeseen circumstances | N | Y |
| 1.3 | Conduct Track Inspection | Assistant Foreman (track) | Wabtrax | Crew assignment and task list | Inspection report | Defect detection rate above 80% | Inadequate inspection tools or techniques | Y | N |
| 1.4 | Review Inspection Report | Track Supervisor | NetControl | Inspection report | Defect classification and prioritization | Report accuracy rate above 90% | Misclassification of defects | Y | Y |
| 1.5 | Plan Defect Repair | Track Supervisor | Umler | Defect classification and prioritization | Repair plan and work order | Repair plan completion rate above 95% | Resource allocation issues | N | Y |
| 1.6 | Execute Defect Repair | Assistant Foreman (track) | PS Technology | Repair plan and work order | Repair completion report | Repair efficiency rate above 85% | Inadequate repair materials or equipment | Y | N |
| 1.7 | Verify Repair Completion | Track Supervisor | Wabtrax | Repair completion report | Verification report | Verification accuracy rate above 90% | Inconsistent verification methods | Y | Y |
| 1.8 | Update Track Condition Database | Track Supervisor | Umler | Verification report | Updated track condition database | Database update accuracy rate above 95% | Data entry errors | N | N |
| 1.9 | Notify Stakeholders | Track Supervisor | NetControl | Updated track condition database | Stakeholder notification | Notification accuracy rate above 90% | Communication breakdown | N | Y |
| 1.10 | Review and Improve Process | Chief Engineer / VP Engineering | NetControl | Stakeholder feedback and inspection data | Process improvement plan | Continuous improvement rate above 80% | Resistance to change | Y | N |
| 1.11 | Implement Process Improvements | Chief Engineer / VP Engineering | NetControl | Process improvement plan | Updated process documentation | Implementation rate above 90% | Resource constraints | N | Y |
| 1.12 | Monitor and Report Compliance | Track Supervisor | NetControl | Updated process documentation | Compliance report | Compliance rate above 95% | Inconsistent compliance monitoring | Y | N |
📊 KPIs & Risk Register
KPIs
Track inspection coverage rate above 95% Crew availability rate above 90% Defect detection rate above 80% Report accuracy rate above 90% Repair efficiency rate above 85% Verification accuracy rate above 90% Database update accuracy rate above 95% Notification accuracy rate above 90% Continuous improvement rate above 80% Implementation rate above 90% Compliance rate above 95%
Key Risks
Air brake test defect released to the road Inadequate inspection tools or techniques Resource allocation issues Inadequate repair materials or equipment Inconsistent verification methods Data entry errors Communication breakdown Resistance to change Resource constraints Inconsistent compliance monitoring
Swim Lanes
Track Supervisor · 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 1.9 Assistant Foreman (track) · 1.3, 1.6, 1.7 Chief Engineer / VP Engineering · 1.10, 1.11