RR-06 RR-06-02-02 — Automated Track Inspection (geometry and rail flaw)
This process involves the automated inspection of track geometry and rail flaws using advanced technologies to ensure safety, compliance with regulations, and optimal performance of the railroad infrastructure.
🗺 BPMN Process Flow
Click diagram to zoom & pan • Scroll to zoom • Drag to pan • Download SVG
📋 Process Attributes
| Process ID | RR-06-02-02 |
|---|---|
| Domain Family | OPERATIONS |
| L1 Domain | Engineering: Track, Structures & Signals |
| L2 Process Group | Automated Track Inspection (geometry and rail flaw) |
| Trigger | Scheduled maintenance window or detection of anomalies by real-time monitoring systems |
| Outcome | Accurate identification and reporting of track issues, ensuring timely repairs and adherence to regulatory standards. |
| Systems | Wabtrax Track geometry car (generic) RailAI (Tetra Tech) NetControl Umler FRA Automated Track Inspection Program (ATIP) |
| Regulatory Hooks | 49 CFR Part 213 49 CFR Part 236, Subpart I GCOR 6.28 |
📋 L4 Process Steps
| Step | Name | Role | System | Input | Output | KPI | Pain Point / Risk | Decision? | Exception? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Initiate Automated Track Inspection | Track Supervisor | Wabtrax | Scheduled maintenance window or anomaly report | Inspection plan and route assignment | Time to initiate inspection < 1 hour | Scheduling conflicts with other maintenance activities | N | N |
| 1.2 | Deploy Track Geometry Car | Roadmaster | Track geometry car (generic) | Inspection plan and route assignment | Real-time track data | Data collection accuracy > 95% | Technical issues with the track geometry car | N | Y |
| 1.3 | Analyze Inspection Data | Track Supervisor | RailAI (Tetra Tech) | Real-time track data | Inspection report with anomalies identified | Anomaly detection rate > 90% | High volume of data leading to analysis delays | Y | N |
| 1.4 | Review and Prioritize Anomalies | Track Supervisor | NetControl | Inspection report with anomalies identified | Prioritized list of anomalies for repair | Anomaly prioritization accuracy > 85% | Balancing safety concerns with operational efficiency | Y | N |
| 1.5 | Schedule Repairs | Track Supervisor | NetControl | Prioritized list of anomalies for repair | Repair schedule and resource allocation plan | Repair scheduling efficiency > 90% | Resource constraints affecting repair timelines | N | Y |
| 1.6 | Execute Repairs | Assistant Foreman (track) | NetControl | Repair schedule and resource allocation plan | Completed repair logs | Repair completion rate > 95% | Field conditions affecting repair execution | N | Y |
| 1.7 | Verify Repairs | Roadmaster | Track geometry car (generic) | Completed repair logs | Verification report | Verification accuracy > 90% | Ensuring thoroughness in verification | Y | N |
| 1.8 | Update Maintenance Records | Track Supervisor | Umler | Verification report | Updated maintenance records | Record update accuracy > 95% | Data entry errors affecting record integrity | N | Y |
| 1.9 | Report to Regulatory Authorities | Track Supervisor | FRA Automated Track Inspection Program (ATIP) | Updated maintenance records | Regulatory report | Compliance with regulatory reporting deadlines > 95% | Meeting stringent regulatory requirements | N | Y |
| 1.10 | Review and Improve Process | Track Supervisor | NetControl (service design use) | Regulatory report | Process improvement plan | Continuous process improvement rate > 85% | Identifying areas for process optimization | Y | N |
| 1.11 | Implement Process Improvements | Track Supervisor | NetControl (service design use) | Process improvement plan | Updated inspection protocols | Implementation rate of process improvements > 90% | Resistance to change affecting implementation | N | Y |
| 1.12 | Monitor and Adjust | Track Supervisor | NetControl (service design use) | Updated inspection protocols | Continuous monitoring data | Process performance improvement > 5% | Maintaining momentum in process improvements | Y | N |
📊 KPIs & Risk Register
KPIs
Time to initiate inspection < 1 hour Data collection accuracy > 95% Anomaly detection rate > 90% Anomaly prioritization accuracy > 85% Repair scheduling efficiency > 90% Repair completion rate > 95% Verification accuracy > 90% Record update accuracy > 95% Compliance with regulatory reporting deadlines > 95% Continuous process improvement rate > 85% Implementation rate of process improvements > 90% Process performance improvement > 5%
Key Risks
Technical issues with the track geometry car Resource constraints affecting repair timelines Field conditions affecting repair execution Data entry errors affecting record integrity Meeting stringent regulatory requirements Resistance to change affecting implementation
Swim Lanes
Track Supervisor · 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11 Roadmaster · 1.2, 1.7 Assistant Foreman (track) · 1.6